![]() ![]() Rule utilitarianism is similar but considers not just whether the outcome was good or bad but also how likely it was that action would produce a good outcome. Act utilitarianism allows for flexibility in decision-making, while rule utilitarianism provides a clear and consistent guideline for decision-making.Ĭomparison Table Parameters of Comparison Act Utilitarianism Rule Utilitarianism Definition Act utilitarianism is a philosophy that judges the morality of an action based on its immediate consequences, without concern for future or long-term effects.Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of each action, while rule utilitarianism focuses on the long-term benefits of following a certain rule.Act utilitarianism evaluates each action based on its utility or usefulness, while rule utilitarianism evaluates each action based on the usefulness of the rule that governs it.Rule utilitarianism, on the other hand, claims that knowledge of human nature enables us to derive a set of moral rules- “rules” as in principles or commandments – which we can follow consistently with good results. It holds that there are no universal moral rules, and instead, each person should do what they think will produce the best overall consequences. Act utilitarianism is an ethical theory that judges the morality of any action by considering the consequences it leads to for everyone involved. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |